*Etteh used forged certificates to contest, filed reply out of time – Eyiboh

*Eyiboh’s ‘evidences’ invalid – Etteh, PDP, INEC

Pre-trial commenced today at the National and State Houses Assembly tribunal sitting in Uyo in the case brought before it by Rt. Hon. Eseme Eyiboh, the House of Representatives candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Eket Federal Constituency.

Eyiboh and the APC were represented by Barr Jumbo Udom, alongside Mfon Udeme Esq and Noami Udofia Esq.

The 1st Respondent, Hon. Okpulupm Etteh, the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), who was declared as winner of the said election, was represented by Barr Ekpenyong Ntekim alongside Israel Okon Esq, Unwana Okon Esq and others.

PDP, the 2nd Respondent in the case, was represented by Uwemedimo Nwoko SAN, alongside Utibe Nwoko, Enyinmfon Nwoko, Etimbuk Udofia and others.

The 3rd Respondent, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) was represented by Daniel Nweke Esq alongside Emmanuel Eze Esq.

READ:  NO REFUND OF CASH AFTER PAYMENT: Peace Mass Transit loses in court

Addressing the tribunal, the petitioners’ lead Counsel, Barr Jumbo Udom said all the relevant processes to enable the pre-trial progress have been filed before the tribunal and served on the respondents.
He added that answers to the petitioners’ reply have also been filed.

He, however, pointed out that the 1st respondent filed his reply out of the 21 days timeframe allowed by law, and therefore such should be dismissed.
Chairman of the panel, Hon. Justice Kudirat Jose, reserved ruling on the application till May 5, 2023, which is the next adjourned date.

Continuing, Udom announced that the prosecution would call 5 Witnesses and 2 subpoenae.
Ntekim said the 1st Respondent will rely on one witness and two subpoenae, Nwoko SAN said the 2nd Respondent will call two witnesses while Nweke said INEC has no witness but will rely on one supoena.

All parties noted that the issue before the tribunal cannot be resolved without trial and gave the tribunal the go-ahead to proceed with the case.

READ:  LEGAL ANGLE: Will the Grant of Land fail upon change from original purpose intended?

Ntekim, Lead Counsel to Okpulupm Etteh, adjudged that the documents presented by the petitioners as evidence were mere computer generated documents which violate the Evidence Act.

Nwoko SAN, Lead Counsel to PDP, objected to the petitioners’ “evidence”, stressing that they are not Certified True Copies.
Nweke, Counsel to INEC also dismissed the authenticity of the documents.

The panel adjourned to 5th of May, 2023, for continuation of pre-trial.

Rt Hon Eseme Eyiboh is praying the tribunal that he be declared as winner of the election, insisting that the scores announced by INEC “did not represent the lawful votes or scores of the parties at the election.”

He said he scored the majority of lawful votes cast at the polling units and alleged that “the majority of his votes obtained from the units and the results as announced and pasted at the units were unlawfully excluded at the point of collation at the Local Government collation centers or mischievously reduced by the collation officers to the
advantage of the 1 respondent.”

READ:  LEGAL ANGLE: A “WILL” Cannot Overpower Customs In Yoruba & Benin States In Nigeria

Eyiboh is also alleging that Etteh “was not qualified to have contested the said House of Representatives election having presented forged certificates and certificates with inconsistent names to the electoral umpire, the Independent
National Electoral Commission, INEC.”

His petition before the tribunal avers that he shall demonstrate through oral and documentary evidence prove that Etteh wasn’t qualified to have participated or
contested in the election.

15 petitions are before the three-member panel headed by Justice Kudirat Jose of the Lagos State High Court. 2 petitions were filed in respect of the Senate elections, 7 in respect of the House of Representatives elections and 6 in respect of the State House of Assembly elections.

(C) Ofonime Honesty